Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework released: How will this affect your building?
- AESG Solutions
- Dec 11, 2023
- 2 min read
Updated: Mar 27, 2024
On the 21st of September 2023, the Minister for Planning for the Victorian State Government released Minister's Guideline 15, pursuant to section 188(1)(c) of the Building Act 1993. To support this statement, the new Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework was introduced.
This new guideline applies to the following buildings:
Buildings that are classified as Class 2 or Class 3, or part of buildings that are classified as Class 2 or Class 3;
Buildings constructed prior to, or have an Occupancy Permit or Certificate of final inspection issued prior to February 1st 2021; and
Buildings which have combustible external cladding.
Ministerial Guideline 15 asserts that when issuing a building notice, or where a building notice has been issued, the relevant building surveyor must have regard to the Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework.
What is the Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework?
The Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework adopts a risk-based approach to combustible cladding rectification that prioritises alternative risk-reduction methods as opposed to the complete removal of high-risk combustible cladding where possible, to achieve an acceptable risk rating.
The Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework separates buildings into three risk categories:
Cladding risk rating category | Sprinkler protected | Not sprinkler protected |
Unacceptable | Risk of fire spread across the Combustible External Cladding of ≥ 4 Sole Occupancy Units (SOU) | Risk of fire spread across the Combustible External Cladding of ≥ 3 SOU |
Elevated | Risk of fire spread across the Combustible External Cladding of 3 SOU | Risk of fire spread across the Combustible External Cladding of 2 SOU |
Low | Risk of fire spread across the Combustible External Cladding of ≤ 2 SOU | Risk of fire spread across the Combustible External Cladding of ≤ 1 SOU |
Achieving an acceptable risk rating:
An acceptable Risk Rating is defined as either:
Classed as low risk in accordance with the framework's rating system; or
Presents an overall level of risk to life that is reasonably similar to, or less than the risk if the same building had no combustible cladding present.
Where possible, the framework suggests that the following rectification measures should be prioritised to achieve an acceptable risk rating:
Removal of combustible external cladding proximate to ignition sources;
Prevention of fires reaching combustible external cladding;
Prevention of fires already alight in the cladding façade from reaching residences; and
Providing early warning regarding the presence of fire to early and safe evacuation of the building.
How is this different from previous guidelines?
Shift from zero tolerance approach to a risk-based management approach
This would include the identification of ignition sources and the removal of combustible cladding from those ignition sources or the protection of ignition sources
Some ignition sources might include:
Air conditioning compressors;
Lighting;
External heaters (gas);
Barbeques (gas); and
Balconies due to the potential for smokers.
What does this mean going forward?
When inspecting a property for flammable cladding, ignition sources should be recorded as part of the report in order to provide advice that is in line with Ministerial Guideline 15.
For example, if a building that is cladded in EPS has balconies, the guideline would consider removing the cladding from around the balcony, which would be considered an ignition source, and retaining other areas of EPS as there would not be an ignition source in those areas.
Learn More:
AESG's knowledge and experience in the building and compliance industry give us the unique skillset and resources to provide National solutions to your building compliance issues. AESG can draw on its team of specialist Architects, Engineers, Compliance Consultants and Building Practitioners.
Contact us via 1300 336 339, solutions@aesg.com.au, or visit our cladding page for further information.
Links & Resources:
Ministers Guideline 15 (Victoria State Government)
Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework (Victoria State Government)
The introduction of Minister's Guideline 15 marks a significant shift in the approach to cladding safety by prioritizing a risk-based methodology. This means that the framework could lead to more nuanced inspections and interventions, potentially allowing buildings like those managed by Ozwin to retain some cladding while addressing specific risks. However, the balancing of safety and practicality remains a complex issue that warrants further scrutiny.
The introduction of Minister's Guideline 15 signifies a pivotal shift in approach towards building safety concerning combustible cladding. The adoption of a risk-based management approach creates a framework where the prioritization of risk reduction over complete removal of cladding becomes central. This is noteworthy, as the Speedau impact could alter compliance strategies significantly, raising questions about the long-term safety implications and effectiveness of this new methodology in practice.
The introduction of Minister's Guideline 15 marks a significant shift in how combustible cladding is managed in Victoria. By adopting a risk-based approach, it seems the emphasis is now on assessing specific risks associated with buildings rather than applying a blanket removal policy. This nuanced strategy could potentially lead to more practical solutions, such as the discussion surrounding Royal Reels https://recfish.co.nz/ which emphasizes targeted interventions based on risk assessments. However, the effectiveness of this approach will depend on its implementation and adherence by building surveyors.
The introduction of Minister's Guideline 15 and the Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework signifies a notable shift in approach from a zero-tolerance policy to a risk-based management strategy. This raises important questions about the implications for safety and compliance. The reliance on https://womenofletters.com.au mechanisms like Payid for funding compliance efforts could potentially affect how effectively these guidelines are implemented, particularly in high-risk buildings.
The introduction of Minister's Guideline 15 and the Cladding Risk Mitigation Framework reflects a notable shift in policy towards a risk-based management approach. The emphasis on reducing risk rather than enforcing a strict removal of combustible cladding indicates a more nuanced understanding of fire safety. However, the effectiveness of this strategy remains to be examined as it could potentially lead to varying interpretations of acceptable risk levels. Leon https://simplicityfunds.kiwi/ has raised some valid concerns regarding the consistency in application across different buildings.